Page 39 - Beaumont Basin Watermaster
P. 39

Beaumont Basin Watermaster
               2013 Reevaluation of the Beaumont Basin Safe Yield                                                                                 3-Apr-15

               in  the  northeast  are  assumed  to  be  impermeable  and  were  modeled  as  no-flow  areas.
               Groundwater flow barriers were incorporated into the southern portion of the Model Domain to
               simulate head differences caused by faults.  The GHB was incorporated along faults and bedrock
               areas to allow subsurface inflow into the model from the mountain block.  Groundwater levels at
               the model boundaries in the Yucaipa, Banning and San Timoteo Creek area were constrained
               using the specified head boundary package based on the historical hydrographs for wells in those
               areas.  Measured groundwater levels for all specified head wells are provided in Appendix F and
               hydrographs for these wells are in Appendix G.



               5.5  Aquifer Characteristics

               5.5.1  Layer Elevations
               Groundwater layers were developed based on depth-specific analysis of groundwater flow and
               quality, as described in Section 3.3.2 (see Figures 18 and 19).  The top of Layer 1 is the ground
               surface as determined by USGS Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) (30 meter resolution) for the
               Model Domain.  The contoured surface of the contact between Layer 1 and Layer 2 (upper and
               lower  aquifers)  was  developed  and  digitized  using  the  software  package  Surfer  (Golden
               Software, 2002) (see Figure 19).




               5.5.2  Hydraulic Conductivity
               Hydraulic conductivity values were spatially represented in the groundwater flow model as zones
               (see Figures 30 and 31).  Each zone of equal hydraulic conductivity was determined for each
               model layer based on analysis of pumping test  data and soil textural  analysis as  described in
               Section 3.3.2.3 (see Figures 23 and 24).  After assigning initial hydraulic conductivity values to
               the zones, the values were adjusted during model calibration, within a plausible range based on
               available data, until an acceptable match was obtained between measured and model-generated
               groundwater  levels.    Final  calibrated  hydraulic  conductivity  zones  are  shown  on  Figures  30
               and 31.



               5.5.3  Specific Yield and Storativity

               Because Layer 1 is unconfined, storage properties of the aquifer in this layer are addressed as
               estimates of specific yield.  Initial zones and values for specific yield were assigned to Layer 1
               based  on  the  textural  analysis  and  literature  values  for  the  soil  types  (Johnson,  1967).    Final
               specific  yield  zones  and  values  were  developed  during  model  calibration  and  are  shown  on
               Figure 32.




                                                             31
   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44