Page 10 - Yucaipa Valley Water District - Board Workshop
P. 10

INSIGHT: PFAS Liability Is Coming to California              about:reader?url=https://www.bna.com/insight-pfas-liability-n57982093402/


                 real guidance, the OEHHA declared it “remains the responsibility”

                 of regulated parties “to determine if a warning is necessary or a

                 discharge is prohibited.”


                 In the meantime, the OEHHA recommended “interim notification

                 levels” for PFOA and PFOS for use by the State Water Resources

                 Control Board in regulating public water supplies in California that

                 are almost as low as detection limits. Upon the OEHHA’s

                 recommendation—and similar to the regulators in New Jersey—the

                 board adopted notification levels for PFOA of 14 parts per trillion

                 and for PFOS of 13 parts per trillion. These notification levels

                 provide drinking water guidelines for local agencies to follow in

                 detecting and reporting PFOA and PFOS in public water supplies.

                 Granted, the guidelines adopted by the board are technically

                 distinct from Proposition 65 and only require local water agencies to

                 report PFOA or PFOS to their boards when those contaminants are

                 detected at or above prescribed notification levels. Yet, these

                 exceptionally low thresholds were specifically recommended by the

                 OEHHA, and it is unlikely the agency would accept anything higher

                 than that threshold under Proposition 65.


                 Even worse, federal, state, and local regulators have already

                 undertaken significant testing of public water supplies in California

                 for PFAS-related compounds, which could be used to support

                 aggressive Proposition 65 claims the moment the warning

                 requirement goes into effect in November.


                 According to a recent statewide analysis of drinking water sources

                 pursuant to the federal “Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule,”

                 at least 36 sources have PFOS detections, and 32 sources have

                 PFOA detections. In other words, data already exist that show

                 California drinking water supplies have been exposed to chemicals

                                       Yucaipa Valley Water District - January 29, 2019 - Page 10 of 100

 6 of 9                                                                                                  11/28/2018, 10:45 AM
   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15