Page 115 - Beaumont Basin Watermaster

Section 4
Water Quality Conditions

Table 4-1
Nitrate (NO3) and TDS Summary for Domestic Wells (2014-18)

Agency/ Nitrate as NO3 Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)

Well No. Count Avg Max Count Ave Max
City of Banning
Well C-2A 6 9.0 11.0 1 240 240

Well C-3 7 7.0 9.0 2 180 190
Well C-4 7 4.0 5.0 2 185 190
Well M-3 7 9.0 10.0 2 290 300
Beaumont Cherry Valley Water District

Well 03 2 4.8 7.7 1 240 240
Well 16 42 27.0 33.0 1 330 330
Well 21 41 15.0 16.2 2 280 290
Well 22 3 7.0 14.0 1 260 260

Well 23 14 11.0 15.0 3 230 260
Well 24 5 7.0 8.1 1 210 210
Well 25 3 6.0 7.2 1 230 230
Well 26 1 4.0 4.0 1 180 180

Well 29 3 10.0 10.0 2 215 220
Yucaipa Valley Water District
Well 48 6 9.0 10.0 5 180 220

South Mesa Water Company
Well 4 11 16.0 22.1 1 190 190
Overlying Users
Sharondale 1 21 21.0 27.0 2 290 320

Sharondale 2 11 21.0 24.0 2 290 320
Plantation 1 6 7.0 9.0 2 260 270
RCMHP 1 7 20.0 28.0 1 260 260
RCMHP 2 18 25.0 30.0 1 270 270

4.2.2 Trace Metals
As indicated earlier, not a single domestic well exceeded the primary federal and state
standards during the reporting period. This represents a significant improvement over
previous reporting periods when several wells exceeded the MCL for trace metals. Trace
metals are briefly discussed here and compared to previous reporting periods.

Beaumont Basin Watermaster 2018 Annual Report – DRAFT - February 2019 4-9