Page 59 - Yucaipa Valley Water District
P. 59

Director Memorandum No. 18-022                                                     Page 13 of 22



                       7.     DISPUTE RESOLUTION

                              The Parties recognize that there may be disputes regarding the obligations of the
               Parties or the interpretation of this Agreement.  The Parties agree that they may attempt to resolve
               disputes as follows:

                              7.1    Statement Describing Alleged Violation of Agreement.  A Party or Parties
               alleging a violation of this Agreement (the “Initiating Party(ies)”) shall provide a written statement
               describing all facts that it believes constitute a violation of this Agreement to the Party(ies) alleged
               to have violated the terms of this Agreement (the “Responding Party(ies)”).

                              7.2    Response to Statement of Alleged Violation.  The Responding Party(ies)
               shall have sixty (60) days from the date of the written statement to prepare a written response to
               the allegation of a violation of this Agreement and serve that response on the Initiating Party(ies)
               or to cure the alleged violation to the reasonable satisfaction of the Initiating Party(ies).  The
               Initiating Party(ies) and the Responding Party(ies) shall then meet within thirty (30) days of the
               date of the response to attempt to resolve the dispute amicably.

                              7.3    Mediation  of  Dispute.    If  the  Initiating  Party(ies)  and  the  Responding
               Party(ies) cannot resolve the dispute within ninety (90) days of the date of the written response,
               they shall engage a mediator, experienced in water-related disputes, to attempt to resolve the
               dispute.  Each Party shall ensure that it is represented at the mediation by a Director or Trustee
               or other representative with authority to settle.  These representatives of the Initiating Party(ies)
               and  the  Responding  Party(ies)  may  consult  with  staff  and/or technical consultants  during the
               mediation and such staff and/or technical consultants may be present during the mediation.  The
               costs of the mediator shall be divided evenly between the Initiating Party(ies) and the Responding
               Party(ies).  The decision of the mediator shall be non-binding.

                              7.4    Reservation of Rights.  Subject to the above requirements, in the event that
               mediation fails, each Party retains and may exercise all legal and equitable rights and remedies
               it may have to enforce the terms of this Agreement; provided, that prior to commencing litigation,
               a Party shall provide at least five (5) calendar days’ written notice of its intent to sue to all Parties.

                       8.     RELATIONSHIP TO WATER RIGHTS AND PRIOR AGREEMENTS

                              8.1    Water  Rights  and  Existing  Agreements.    Nothing  in  this  Agreement  is
               intended to modify the water rights of the Parties or the Ex Oficio participants, whether existing
               under a judgment, proceedings of the State Water Resources Control Board, or the common law.
               Nothing in this Agreement is intended to modify any existing agreements between and among the
               Parties, unless expressly stated herein.

                              8.2    Agreements Among Water Users.  Nothing in this Agreement is intended
               to modify the rights of the signatories of this Agreement among themselves.

                              8.3    Judgments.  Nothing in this Agreement is intended to modify the rights of
               the Parties under the terms of the judgments in Orange County Water District v. City of Chino et
               al. (Orange County Superior Court, Case No. 117628, April 17, 1969) and Western Municipal
               Water District of Riverside County v. East San Bernardino County Water District et al. (Riverside
               County Superior Court Case No. 78426, April 17, 1969); Chino Basin Water District v. City of
               Chino, San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. 164327; Big Bear Municipal Water District v.






                                    Yucaipa Valley Water District - February 6, 2018 - Page 59 of 175
   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64