Page 67 - Yucaipa Valley Water District
P. 67
Director Memorandum No. 18-022 Page 21 of 22
where,
Party Water Use (acre-feet) = the Party’s total average water use over the past,
complete, 5 year period (surface water, groundwater, recycled water, imported water,
etc.)
Total Water Use (acre-feet) = Summation of each individual Party Water Use
Total Equitable Water Cost = Sustainable Amount x SWP Cost
where,
Sustainable Amount (acre-feet) = The amount of SWP water, in acre-feet, needed to
achieve long-term sustainability which shall be obtained from the latest edition of the
San Bernardino Valley Regional Urban Water Management Plan, Average Scenario
for the latest planning year plus the published reliability factor, currently 10%
SWP cost ($/acre-foot) = The cost for recharged SWP water as published in the San
Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District Resolution 888, as amended
Total Gap ($) = Summation of each individual Party Gap ($) for all Parties
Proportioning Safe Yield.
The Western-San Bernardino Judgment does not apportion the safe yield by water agency. The Parties
agree that, for purposes of this agreement, the Safe Yield will be apportioned, as follows:
Safe Yield1959-63: The safe yield during the Base Period was proportioned as follows:
Agency Safe Yield1959-63
Bear Valley Mutual Water Company 12,996
City of Colton 3,150
City of Loma Linda 1,855
City of Redlands 26,598
City of Rialto 1,890
City of San Bernardino 19,425
East Valley Water District 13,599
Fontana Union Water Company 14,221
Loma Linda University 1,016
Mountain View Power Co. 1,040
Muscoy Mutual Water Company No. 1 1,767
San Bernardino County - Facility Management 1,532
San Bernardino Valley M.W.D. -
Terrace Water Company 984
West Valley Water District 11,752
Yucaipa Valley Water District -
Yucaipa Valley Water District - February 6, 2018 - Page 67 of 175