Page 32 - Beaumont Basin Watermaster
P. 32

Beaumont Basin Watermaster
               2013 Reevaluation of the Beaumont Basin Safe Yield                                                                                 3-Apr-15

               area.  The subsurface underflow  at  Smith  Creek was  estimated using the values published in
               Rewis et al. (2006).



               4.1.5  Return Flow

               Return flow rates were estimated for each of the land use categories shown on Figure 7 and listed
               in Table 3.  The unit return flow rates were applied to the areas for each land use condition to
               estimate a total return flow for any given period.  As the areas for each land use changed over
               time,  the  total  return  flow  for  that  land  use  condition  also  changed  accordingly.    The
               methodology for estimating the unit return flow rates for each land use condition is described in
               the following subsections.



               4.1.5.1  Return Flow from Irrigated Agriculture
               Return flow from irrigated agriculture was  estimated based on estimates of applied  water for
               crops and trees historically grown in the Study Area (see Figure 7).  Crop types were grouped
               from land use maps into two categories:  grains and trees.  Total applied water for grains was
               based on DWR, 1986.  Total applied water for trees was based on an analysis of delivered water
               records  for  parcels  identified  from  aerial  photographs  as  having  small  (i.e.  less  than  5  acres)
               orchards.    Consumptive  use  (water  that  is  utilized  by  the  plant,  transpired,  or  evaporated)  is
               assumed to be 75 percent of the total applied water.  Thus, 25 percent of total water demand from
               irrigated agriculture is assumed to become groundwater return flow.  Native and non-irrigated
               agriculture is assumed to have no return flow.



               4.1.5.2  Return Flow in Low-Density Residential Areas

               The Cherry Valley community is a low-density residential area within the northern portion of the
               Study  Area,  which  discharges  wastewater  through  individual  household  septic  systems  (see
               Figure 7).  Return flow was estimated for the area of individual septic systems based on parcel
               size and average annual delivered water as reported by BCVWD (see Table 4).  For the smallest
               parcels (0.25-acre and smaller), 50 percent of the delivered water (0.17 acre-ft/year/parcel) was
               assumed to be used indoors and ultimately discharged through the septic system.   The other 50
               percent was assumed to be used for outdoor landscape irrigation.  For parcels larger than 0.25
               acres,  the  indoor  water  use  was  fixed  at  0.17  acre-ft/year  and  the  balance  of  delivered  water
               assumed to be used outdoors.  For low-density residential areas, 100 percent of indoor water use
               is assumed to become groundwater recharge and 25 percent of outdoor water use is returned to
               the  groundwater.    Thus,  62  percent  of  delivered  water  to  low-density  residential  areas  with
               individual septic systems is assumed to become groundwater recharge.



                                                             24
   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37