Page 193 - _ 180314 Special Yucaipa GSA Packet
P. 193

  Built‐in telemetry and sensors to provide real‐time
                       notifications of (a) low‐water pressure from the
                       water source or (b) exceedances of low‐water and
                       high‐water level thresholds in the test basin.

                     Redundancy of flow meters at the hydrant
                       connection and on the final discharge piping ensures
                       that volumes entering the pit are reliably tracked.

               All field activities would be conducted to ensure minimal
               disturbance to native vegetation and minimize soil erosion
               along channel banks and follow site management practices
               described in Section 1.9 of the Work Plan.

               In order to minimize labor and equipment costs and ensure
               an efficient work flow, we propose to implement the
                                                                              Example: Infiltration Test at Ford Ponds
               recommended test sequencing described in Section 3.1 –            Santa Clara Valley Water District
               Fieldwork Schedule of the Work Plan (use of two infiltration
               systems simultaneously at two sites staggered one‐week apart). Costs assume site visits by field
               personnel twice a week (once on Mondays during routine site mobilization and demobilization
               and once on Thursdays) to monitor the flow control system and record flowmeter readings and
               basin water levels.

               Examination of the use of three infiltration test systems (versus two systems) indicate that
               there would be minimal savings in labor and equipment costs with increased field management
               challenges. Accordingly, cost estimates and schedules are presented for an approach using two
               infiltration systems.

               At the completion of infiltration testing, each test basin would be backfilled with the excavated
               material, and the site would be returned to its original, pre‐disturbed grade. It is assumed that
               formal compaction and compaction testing is not required.

               Task 3 – Draft and Final Reports


               Results of the infiltration testing program will be documented in a Draft Report provided to
               Valley District for review; comments will be incorporated into a Final Report. The report will
               document all key field activities, results, and findings. Tables and charts of collected field data
               and calculated instantaneous and average vertical infiltration rates for each test will be
               included. The report will provide conclusions on the feasibility of recharging water at each site
               based on infiltration test results and lithologic logs of nearby exploratory wells (if applicable).
               Suitable locations for siting spreading basins at each site will be described along with
               recommendations for next implementation steps. Comments received will be incorporated into
               a Final Report, which will be submitted to Valley District. All report files will be submitted in the
               latest Adobe Acrobat PDF and Microsoft Word formats.

               Proposal – SBVMWD Yucaipa Basin Area           3                         TODD GROUNDWATER
               Infiltration Testing of Thirteen Sites                                            January 2018
                                  Yucaipa Groundwater Sustainability Agency - March 14, 2018 - Page 170 of 226
   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198